摘要： 近年来，法院与政府在行政诉讼中频繁互动，以绩效治理切入，能为透视府院互动的制度动因与实践发展提供新的视角。从现状看，府院双方面临的法治政府建设考核与司法质效评估，使得双方在绩效压力下产生了协同需求，进而推动了府院互动的普遍化发展。当前的府院互动实践，呈现出效能增益与法治张力并存的双重面向。一方面，府院互动确实对弥合司法裁判与争议化解之间的结构性断裂有所助益，展现了协同治理的制度效能；另一方面，绩效驱动的互动实践也存在异化风险，可能导致司法中立性受损、行政违法行为脱离司法监督、当事人权益保护不足等风险，引发工具理性僭越价值理性的担忧。绩效压力驱动的府院互动有其合理性，但应当进行法治规范，使绩效治理服务于法治目标。为此，应将府院互动置于法治价值的统摄之下，通过完善司法质效评价体系和优化法治政府建设成效考核机制，实现府院互动的规范发展。

关键词: 府院互动, 绩效治理, 行政诉讼, 司法质效评价, 法治政府

Abstract: In recent years, courts and government agencies have engaged in increasingly frequent interactions within the context of administrative litigation. Adopting the lens of performance-based governance offers a novel theoretical perspective for examining the institutional drivers and practical development of court-government interaction. From a practical standpoint, the dual pressures of rule-of-law government assessment on the executive side and judicial performance evaluation on the judicial side have generated mutual incentives for collaboration, thereby propelling the widespread proliferation of court-government interaction. Current practices exhibit a dual character in which enhanced governance efficacy coexists with rule-of-law tensions. On one hand, court-government interaction has demonstrably contributed to bridging the structural gap between judicial adjudication and substantive dispute resolution, reflecting the institutional benefits of collaborative governance. On the other hand, performance-driven interactions carry risks of institutional distortion, potentially compromising judicial neutrality, allowing unlawful administrative conduct to evade judicial oversight, and undermining the protection of litigants’ rights — raising concerns that instrumental rationality may encroach upon value rationality. While court-government interaction driven by performance pressures possesses a degree of institutional legitimacy, it must be subject to rule-of-law regulation to ensure that performance-based governance serves rather than subverts the objectives of the rule of law. To this end, court-government interaction should be situated within the overarching framework of rule-of-law values, and the rule-of-law development of court-government interaction should be advanced through the refinement of judicial performance evaluation systems and the optimization of assessment mechanisms for rule-of-law government development.

Key words: court-government interaction, performance-based governance, administrative litigation, judicial performance evaluation, rule-of-law government